Peer-Review Process Steps:

• Initial Screening : All submitted abstracts are reviewed by the internal editorial team to ensure adherence to the conference scope. Abstracts that pass this initial screening are assigned to the session chair or review committee for further evaluation.
• Independent Evaluation : The session chair/review committee decides whether independent expert reviews are required. External reviewers evaluate the majority of submissions, with the committee determining the number of reviews necessary.
• Final Decision : Based on the received reviews, the session chair/review committee will:
  • Accept or reject the abstract.
  • Request revisions from the authors in response to reviewers’ comments. Authors have 14 days to resubmit revised abstracts if minor or major revisions are requested.
• Keynote and Invited Speakers : Abstracts submitted by invited and keynote speakers will be reviewed directly by the conference chairman.

Scoring Criteria:

Abstracts will be evaluated based on the following criteria:

• Originality : Novelty of concept/approach and level of innovation.
• Relevance : Significance, impact, and alignment with the conference theme.
• Quality : Strength of research design and theoretical argument.
• Interpretation : Clarity of conclusions and interpretation of results.
• Presentation : Coherence and clarity of structure.

Join Us at Materials Europe 2025

Be part of the World Materials Science Conference 2025, where innovation meets collaboration. With a focus on nanomaterials, biomaterials, and advancements in materials science, this event will set the stage for the future of science and technology of advanced materials. Don’t miss this opportunity to connect, inspire, and advance your field at the European Materials Science Symposium.